Remember ME - You Me and Dementia

Showing posts with label Social Security. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Social Security. Show all posts

June 21, 2015

Old and vulnerable: Senior citizens await national policy to safeguard rights: Pakistan

PAKISTAN News


ISLAMABAD: Pakistan lacks a national policy and legislation to safeguard the fundamental rights of around 12 million senior citizens.
Though a national policy has been finalised, it remains pending with the Capital Administration and Development Division for the last one year. Only the K-P government has approved Senior Citizen Act 2014. The Punjab government has finalised the bill but its cabinet has stalled progress while the Sindh government has presented it in its assembly.
On the World Elder Abuse awareness day, Waqas Qureshi, advocacy and communication coordinator at Help Age International, said the policy was drafted with a two-year delay.
Talking to The Express Tribune, he said it was still waiting to be presented before the National Assembly for a year. He believed that the major reason behind the delay was the government’s attitude as the issue was not on its priority list.
“They do not have dedicated health care centres or proper public transport facilities. They do not even shelter homes where they can live in respect and dignity after being deserted by family members. We can see many senior persons begging on the road as they do not have any source of income,” he said.
According to UNFPA and HelpAge International report, there are 11.6 million people over 60 in Pakistan. This figure will rise to 43.3 million by 2050, making it 15.8% of the total population.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 21st, 2015.



_______________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

June 7, 2013

Good intent, lackadaisical implementation

MUMBAI ,INDIA / ONE INDIA ONE PEOPLE  / SOCIAL SECURITY / JUNE 1st 2013


Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme in India (IGNOAPS), a scheme aimed at providing financial security to the destitute aged living below poverty line fails to achieve its goal because of lackadaisical implemenation, writes Dr. Nidhi Mishra. 

Old age brings with it lot of challenges, a major one is that of financial insecurity. Financial security of elderly in general and particularly of those belonging to BPL category has been a matter of concern, and due to increase in longevity, old age health care expenses, increasing cost of living, the problem has only compounded. Due to lower or negligible family income and rise in the cost of living, the poor often find it difficult to depend on their family for financial support, and thus the role of government becomes important in providing financial security to the destitute aged in our country.
 
Overview of Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS)

Realising the pressing need to provide financial security to the destitute elderly, the IGNOAPSGovernment of India (GOI) launched the National Old Age Pension Scheme (NOAPS) under the National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP) of the Ministry of Rural Development, on 15 August 1995. Like other schemes of NSAP, this scheme is in line with Article 41 of the Constitution of India which directs the State to provide “public assistance to its citizens in case of unemployment, old age, sickness and disablement and in other cases of undeserved want within the limits of its economic capacity and development.”

On 19 November 2007, NOAPS was renamed as Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS) and to widen its scope it has been extended to the elderly who fall Below Poverty Line (BPL). Initially under this scheme, all destitute elderly aged 65 years or above were provided a pension amount of `75 per month. Subsequently, with effect from 1 April 2006, the pension amount was increased to `200 per month per person in order to make this scheme more effective and the state governments were requested by central government to contribute a matching amount for each beneficiary of this scheme. It has been noted that not all states are contributing an equal amount of `200 per person per month to the pension.

To further improve the effectiveness of this scheme, with effect from 1 April 2011, the eligibility age for this scheme has been reduced from 65 to 60 years and the amount of pension has been raised from `200 to `500 per month for those who are 80 years or above.

The other two schemes under NSAP– Annapurna Scheme and Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS) are linked to IGNOAPS in a way that under Annapurna Scheme ten kilograms of food grains are provided free of cost to those BPL elderly who though eligible, have not been covered under the IGNOAPS. And under IGNWPS, once the BPL widows reach the age of 60 years they are transferred to IGNOAPS.

The Annual Report (2012-13) of the Ministry of Rural Development, GOI, highlights coverage of 223.18 lakh BPL elderly all over India, where the highest number of beneficiaries were reported in Bihar (37.87 lakh), followed by Uttar Pradesh (37.67 lakh) and Odisha (17.77 lakh). The total expenditure reported under NSAP for the year 2012-2013 is `4855.77 crore, although a total of `8447.30 crore was allocated for it. IGNOAPS is a part of NSAP and is allotted a major portion of the funds, however, the exact breakup of scheme wise budget allocation under NSAP is not available in the annual report or on the website of Ministry of Rural Development. 

Benefits

The IGNOAPS is praiseworthy, as this is the first ever national level scheme which provides economic security to the poor elderly and widows who would have either been dependent on their family’s limited income or would have been forced to lead a neglected life. This aspect has also been highlighted in one of the participatory study conducted in Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh by the NGO HelpAge India in 2008, where responses of participants indicated that IGNOAPS plays a very important role in poverty reduction. 

Limitations

Over the years, government bodies and social scientists have highlighted some limitations of this scheme mainly in terms of its improper implementation. A research paper jointly published by four professors from Harvard School of Public Health in 2010 highlighted weak targeting of beneficiaries which is generally based on combination of a survey based definition of poverty and community identification of the poor as a major problem related to implementation of this scheme.

In a survey conducted by United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) India in 2012, covering a total of 9,852 elderly in the seven states of India which have higher proportion of elderly viz. Himachal Pradesh, Kerala, Maharashtra, Orissa, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and West Bengal, the problem of wrong targeting was observed. While investigating the utilisation of IGNOAPS, it was found that some non-BPL elderly were also availing the scheme. It was also observed that there was low awareness of this scheme among the beneficiaries, thus raising the need for effective steps to be taken by the government to promote the scheme.
Another targeting issue identified in assessments of this scheme is the difficulty of determining the age of a person, particularly in rural areas. Along with this some researchers (Anand and Kumar, 2006) have also highlighted that while from a macro perspective IGNOAPS seems to be working well, and meeting its many objectives, a micro analysis shows that there are gaps in areas like distribution and the identification of beneficiaries.

In an assessment report of Ministry of Rural Development (2006) it was found that the IGNOAPS is lacking on two grounds which cut across states: (i) it involves complex administrative procedures and, therefore, proves especially difficult for the illiterates, and (ii) the size of programme beneficiaries is capped artificially by using an arbitrary ceiling formula. 

Conclusion and recommendation

It is clear that IGNOAPS is a useful scheme for elderly below poverty line, however, it is facing problems of improper implementation such as wrong targeting, limited coverage and irregular payment of pension which needs to be strongly dealt by the government through improvement of coordination between its various bodies. Also through an effective monitoring and evaluation mechanism the problem of wrong targeting and irregular payments can be controlled by the government. Along with this proper need assessment should be done by the government for effective coverage of the scheme. Additionally, the government should publicise the scheme especially in rural areas and slums for creating awareness amongst potential beneficiaries. Civil society can also play an important role by conducting training programmes for the targeted beneficiaries.


Dr. Nidhi Mishra ,The writer is working at Tata Institute of Social Sciences for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Ageing project in India.

©One India One People Foundation 2013.
_______________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights.
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

April 15, 2013

Senior Citizens to Impact 250 Loksabha Seats in coming Election


MUMBAI , INDIA / POLITICS / APRIL 15th , 2013 

By Sailesh Mishra

Indian Politics ‘Newest’ Vote Bank: Senior Citizens to Impact on 250 Loksabha Seats in coming Election


Taking a cue from recent study “Social Media & Lok Sabha Elections”, by IRIS Knowledge Foundation and supported by the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI), on how Facebook and other social media will impact 160 seats in coming Election, what immediately came to my mind was Elder Population impact on Indian Democracy. I have been trying to market this idea since launch of Silver Innings in April 2008. 

As on 2012 Senior Citizens Population in India is 100 million (10 crore) that comes to roughly 10% of Total Population.  But when we take into account the Total Voting Population i.e. 18+ age group, then Senior Citizens becomes roughly 26% of Voting Population, here I have not taken into account Senior’s influence on Family voting. 

Indian Parliament has 543 constituencies / seats and this 26% strong Vote Bank of Senior Citizens will surely impact more then 250 constituencies. This ‘new’ Senior Citizens Vote bank always existed but no one including elders ever realised their strength . This time 2013/14 Parliamentary and State Election will be change in new thought process towards our elders , they deserved to be respected and cared for as our great tradition need to travel in this new speed changing society . 

I would be happy if any research agency or students take up this interesting subject of ‘Senior Citizens Voting Impact on Indian Politics‘. 

In recent times, since last 3 years there has been contestant activity by most of the political parties to woo Senior Citizens by organising onetime events, trips, goodies etc , but they have failed to make a concrete Long Term Policy & Programme for doubling Ageing population . Government , Politicians and Political parties are Ageing but they don’t bother about Ageing population , which many demographer describe as ‘ Silver Tsunami ‘ , which will have huge economic and social impact on India’s growth . Not to forget the same story will repeat in most of the developing countries. 

Due to advocacy and awareness campaign like ‘ 16th August National Protest Day’  by organization’s like AISCCON, Silver Inning Foundation and a united front called Join Action Committee (JAC) since 16th August 2010 , of more than 32 All India organisation’s working for and with Senior Citizens and newly formed  Pension Parisad ; there has been marked improvement in channelizing & mobilising Senior Citizens as united group demanding basic rights from central and state governments . Senior Citizens pan India, has been slowly realizing their strength and can’t be fooled any more by this goodies of politicians.

Social Media including Facebook and Twitter, has added new type of activism and in fact renewed the whole advocacy movement, Silver Innings a pioneer in social media usage for ageing and many youth and elders have taken this technology route for outreach and mobilising elders and their family.

Iam happy that , Elders like always will give shape to our Future , whatever they demand today will be for betterment of more then 85% of total population. This strengthen my firm view that ‘Our Elders Are Change maker’s ‘, the change we all want to see.


About Author: 
Sailesh Mishra is Founder President of 'Silver Innings' a socail enterprise and Silver Inning Foundation, a NGO working with Senior Citizens and has more then 6 years hard core activist experience in Ageing domain . His unique PR and ICT tool usage for Ageing has made him Internationally known Gerontology Consultant.  He may be contacted at silverinnings@gmail.com

 

________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights.
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

May 11, 2012

UK : The crisis in social care , Indifferent Civilised Society

LONDON UK / Mail Online / Society / May 8, 2012

By Dominique Jackson

The parallel universe of geriatric care is not somewhere most people visit willingly, nor regularly, if they can help it. Most of us cannot even begin to imagine the burgeoning twilight universe which exists alongside ours. After all, the care system only really hits the headlines when brave whistle blowers expose particularly shocking cases of neglect and abuse.
                                                                                                                                       
                     This is a terrifying indictment of how poorly we value the achievements of the older generation and of how quickly and how conveniently we forget the huge debt we owe them

I am not quite sure why most of us choose to remain so blinkered about the crisis in social care? After all, we are all going to get old one day; thus, someone, somewhere is probably going to have to help look after us and somehow, that care is going to have to be paid for. 

Today’s open letter, begging the Prime Minister to open his eyes to the care crisis, is signed by 78 charities and campaign groups, who are all working on the grim, often fraught and woefully under-funded frontline of care provision for the frail, elderly, disabled and otherwise most vulnerable members of society. They know all too well what they are talking about.

Surely, social care is the litmus test of a civilised society? The current crisis, both in funding and provision, is a terrifying indictment of how poorly we value the achievements of the older generation and of how quickly and how conveniently we forget the huge debt we owe them.

I sincerely hope that Mr Cameron takes a few minutes off from his busy day out with Mr Clegg, relaunching the aims of the coalition from a factory in Essex. I hope he takes enough time to read this important letter, to digest what it means and to decide to take some action.

Two years ago, when Messrs Clegg and Cameron stood side by side in the Downing Street Rose Garden, charities and the elderly lobby felt they had some cause for optimism. The coalition soon published a white paper on health care reform which promised “a sustainable legal and financial framework for adult social care” by the second session of parliament.

Yet today we are frustratingly no further on and the government looks increasingly out of touch with its growing numbers of elderly, and vocal, voters in the wake of the “Granny Tax” debacle.

The Queen’s Speech tomorrow is expected to include a vague nod to the importance of social care reform, but there will be no bill brought forward in this session. Thus, we have no hope of any realistic overhaul in long term elderly care for at least another two years.

This is two years too long for a shocking majority of elderly people and their family members, many of whom work as unpaid carers, and a huge number of whom are currently struggling to fund, or even to find, appropriate and adequate support and care. 

Tens of thousands of elderly pensioners are forced to sell their homes to pay for residential care. Many more thousands of senior citizens who do not have that option are trapped in the postcode lottery of care I wrote about on this forum only last week when I highlighted the plight of 99-year-old war veteran and dementia patient Bill Sandford, unable to move close to his daughter and her family because of a shortfall in local council funding.

The Commission on Funding of Care and Support, chaired by economist Andrew Dilnot, called for a limited liability model of social insurance, in which any individual’s liability for the cost of care would be capped at around £35,000, with the state coming in at this threshold.

However, implementing Dilnot’s proposals has reportedly been held up by rows within the Treasury over how to pay for the reforms. A much delayed White Paper on long term care will finally appear next month but is expected to focus mainly on issues such as improving service quality, safeguarding vulnerable patients and on personal budgets to allow greater freedom of choice. How on earth we are expected to pay for all of this is not expected to be directly addressed at all.

This is particularly bad news for those of our poorest senior citizens. Two thirds of the 400,000 pensioners in the country’s care homes are funded by the state and recent cuts to council funding have led inevitably to a drop in levels of staffing, recruitment criteria, provision of training and thus in standards of care.

A report on transforming social care for the poorest elderly people from the Centre for Social Justice think tank is also published today. It argues that the current means-tested system of funding is at breaking point and that the proposed Dilnot reforms ignore the plight of the war time generation who simply do not have any assets to sell.

The CSJ, which was established by work and pensions secretary Iain Duncan Smith while he was in opposition, hopes its findings may influence the politicians who are considering their response to Dilnot in cross-party talks ahead of the White Paper’s appearance in June. 

All this research and all these recommendations are all very well but what we really need  now is some joined-up thinking and some immediate action. We need an open and honest debate about the needs of the elderly and we should all, every single one of us, be involved. After all, we will all be elderly one day.

Our population is ageing and ageing fast. Almost 20 per cent, 11.8 million, of us are now over the retirement age. Of these, 1.3 million are already over the age of 85. Our rapidly ageing population means swiftly rising rates of dementia and growing legions of frail and vulnerable seniors, who are, whether they like it or not, dependent on younger generations.

It should not have to fall to a coalition of charities to have to highlight the scale and urgency of the challenge of social care reform but now that they have bravely brought the debate back into the headlines, it is high time for the government to wake up to this demographic time bomb and act.

© Associated Newspapers Ltd
 
________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights.
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

May 8, 2012

INDIA : Unorganised workers and Elders demand pension


NEW DELHI , INDIA / The Hindu / Pension / May 8, 2012


Feeling excluded':Participants at the Pension 
Parishad dharna in New Delhi on Monday demanding 
universalisation of pension for the elderly.
- Photo: Sandeep Saxena

Demands for a universal pension scheme got bolstered with a large number of underprivileged people including farmers, domestic workers, single women, disabled persons, sex workers and trans-genders from more than 20 States beginning a five-day dharna at Jantar Mantar here on Monday.

The campaign for universalisation of Rs.2,000 as monthly pension for every elderly above 60 years in age and does not come under the tax slab is being spearheaded by Aruna Roy of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sanghatan (MKSS) along with Dr. Baba Adhav, the veteran leader of the unorganised workers in Maharashtra.

Addressing the protestors, Ms. Roy said: “Pension is a right that the aging working poor have earned by virtue of having given the best years of their lives to contribute to the economy. They have grown food for the country's population, built houses and highways, cleaned streets, collected materials for recycling, cooked food and looked after households and assembled electronic goods.”

“Society must provide a decent pension for these people when they are no longer able to work. From where do you expect these poor people to pay for every thing, especially when you don't provide them even half the minimum wages?” Ms. Roy asked.

At present, all elderly over 60 years from the Below Poverty Lines category get Rs.200 per month as pension under the Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS) with the State governments adding usually lesser and in some cases higher amount to the pension.

According to rough estimates there are around two crore beneficiaries of the Government pension scheme against the total elderly population of 10 crore.

The Pension Parishad, an assembly of organisations demanding a universal pension scheme, has rejected the IGNOAPS pension calling it “pittance” which can't ensure a dignified living to the elderly.

“The Government pension is a pittance which is in no way sufficient for the elderly. That is why we are asking for at least Rs.2,000 or half the minimum wage whichever is higher,” said Nikhil Dey, leader of MKSS, who is also part of the Pension Parishad.

On the issue of locating money for the scheme, Prabhat Patnaik, former member of the Kerala State Planning Board and member of the UN Commission, said the State has to do the needful. “If a child doesn't get food, you don't blame the child. In the same manner if the elderly starve, it is the State's duty to ensure a dignified living to them who can't be blamed for being poor.”

Patnaik said that with 14 per cent (Centre and State combined) India has the lowest tax GDP ratio in the world so it has enormous amount of potential to increase taxes.

Referring to the Arjun Sengupta Committee which had talked about modest cess increase of 0.5 per cent to generate funds for social welfare schemes, Mr. Patnaik said even if the government increases the tax by 2 more per cent to 16 per cent, India will still be the country with lowest tax GDP ratio and its elderly population will be able to live a decent life as well.

During the public hearing, most of the elderly talked about extreme despair and how they felt excluded from all entitlements and services even as they struggling to hold their lives together.

Sixty-seven-year-old Ramani Devi doesn't have anyone except a son who has abandoned her in her village in Rajasthan. Now she is left at the mercy of her neighbours. She doesn't get the pension because she doesn't have a BPL card.

“Even if I tell you (what I eat to survive), will you never be able to imagine what I eat?” said Ms. Devi when asked how she survives. Now only the hope for a decent pension has brought her to Delhi from the interiors in Rajasthan.


Copyright © 2012, The Hindu 


Senior Citizens Organizations like Helpage India , Silver Inning Foundation , AISCCON have extended their support to ' Pension Parisad'  .

 
Programme from May 8 - 11
 
8th – Public hearing on Accountability and Grievance Redress related to Pensions and entitlements for the elderly. The Grievance Redress Bill will also be discussed.
9th – Public hearing on issues of marginalised and vulnerable groups
10th – Public hearing on issues related to the National Food Security Bill and food security of the elderly
11th – Pension Parishad discussion on the response to the charter of demands. Planning the way forward.
 
 

________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights.
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

UK : Elderly care funding should focus on poorest

LONDON  , UK / The Guardian / Society / May 7, 2012 

Report by Centre for Social Justice calls for resources to be concentrated on pensioners with few or no assets

By , chief political correspondent

Funding for the long-term care of elderly people should be targeted at the poorest with few or no assets, according to a report by Iain Duncan Smith's thinktank. In a direct challenge to the Dilnot commission, which called for an increase in support for those with assets, the report, by the Centre for Social Justice, calls for resources to be concentrated on pensioners solely dependent on state support.

Iain Duncan Smith's thinktank, the Centre for Social Justice, says low pay, poor training and lack of oversight has to led to 'very poor quality of home care for the most disadvantaged older people'. Photograph: Geoff Newton


The centre was established by the work and pensions secretary while he was in opposition. Its report, to be published on Tuesday, is likely to influence ministers as they consider their response to Dilnot. They are holding cross-party talks before the publication of a white paper setting out their proposals.

Dilnot recommended that the threshold of savings and assets above which the state stops offering help with care costs should rise from £23,250 to £100,000. Its other key recommendation was to impose a cap of £35,000 on the amount any individual would have to pay towards their own care costs during their lifetime.

But Transforming Social Care, the new report, sweeps aside these arguments and says the government should concentrate on the neediest pensioners. It is careful not to define who falls into this group, but it is thinking of those who are wholly dependent on the weekly state pension of £107.45 and have few or no other assets.

Christian Guy, managing director of the Centre for Social Justice, says: "Understandably, there is a lot of concern about better-off pensioners being forced to sell their homes and use the proceeds to pay for their care until they drop below the means-tested threshold. But ministers should make the most vulnerable people and the unacceptable conditions they face their first priority, then phase in the Dilnot recommendations so that help can be extended to all."

The centre says that any extra resources should be focused on the poorest members of the "extraordinary generation" who lived through the second world war, because they suffer most severely from the country's "broken" care system.

The report points out that of the 400,000 elderly people living in care homes, nearly two-thirds are funded by the state. Many, according to the centre, suffer poor care because councils use their purchasing power to drive down fees.

The centre says Dilnot "says little about ameliorating the current system, which is in large part failing many … Those proposals do not address the means-tested system for those who have not been fortunate enough to own their own houses but instead find themselves dependent on the state in their old age."

The CSJ report, which points out that nearly £1bn has been "stripped out of social care budgets in England" in the last year, warns that a failure to target resources on the neediest will have a major impact on the NHS.

"Older people, we know, account for two-thirds of overnight stays in hospitals … Free at the point of use, and always open, accident and emergency departments have in many of the most deprived areas become 'catch-alls' for suffering."

Sarah Pickup, chair of the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services, said the new report was a welcome reminder that implementing the Dilnot proposals on their own would not solve the crisis in adult social care.

"The CSJ is right to say that the commission has provided a good answer to the question about how to provide people with more certainty about the costs of care and to reduce the risk of catastrophic costs, but also to point out that solving this problem will not address the wider issue of the need for a level of funding which is sufficient to fund quality support and services to meet needs."

Labour questioned the premise of the CSJ report on the grounds that the current system already focuses on the poorest. People with combined income and assets above £23,250 have to pay for long-term care. Only pensioners with income and assets below £14,250 qualify for the maximum help from local council social care service. Councils have discretion for people with income and assets between those two figures.

Liz Kendall, the shadow social care minister, said: "The current social care system already focuses on the poorest and neediest in society. The problem is that the government's cuts to local council budgets have pushed the care system to breaking point.

"More than £1bn has been cut from council budgets for older people's social care since the coalition came to power. We need sufficient funding for existing services as well as reform for the future. It's a false choice to suggest otherwise."


© 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited 

________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights.
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

April 1, 2012

USA: Help available for those with limited income

ANNAPOLIS, Maryland / HomeTownAnnapolis / Lifestyle / April 1, 2012

By AMY RUBINO, For Capital Gazette

I just discovered that my 88-year-old mother “dropped” her Medicare Part B. She could not afford the monthly premium of $99.90/month with an income of only $779/month. Her bank account is down to less than $100. She owns nothing — no home, no car, no savings. However, she cannot afford not go without medical insurance. I help her out as much as I can afford; she lives with me and I cover her living expenses. I am financially stretched to my limit. Are there any programs to help?
Your mother should apply for the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary/Specified Low-Income Medicare Beneficiary Programs; QMB/SLMB for short. The QMB/SLMB programs are for people who have Medicare but have limited income and assets.

The QMB program has an upper income limit of $951/month for a single person; $1,281/month for a married couple. The asset limit is $8,440 for a single person; $13,410 for a married couple. The QMB program does not disqualify a person for owning and living in their own home. Nor does the program disqualify a person for having a life insurance policy. The program also does not ask about the value of personal household possessions.

If approved for the QMB program, the state of Maryland will pay your mother’s Medicare Part B premium each month. Your mother would also be issued a gray and white Medical Assistance card that will supplement her Medicare insurance. If she receives the gray and white Medical Assistance card, have your mother confirm that her doctors accept both Medicare and Medical Assistance.

If a person’s income is above the QMB threshold, the application will then be processed for the SLMB program. The asset rules are the same for both the QMB and the SLMB programs. The SLMB program has a higher income threshold. The upper income limits for the SLMB program are $1,277/month for a single person and $1,723/month for a married couple. If approved for the SLMB program, no Medical Assistance card will be issued. Under the SLMB program, the state of Maryland pays the monthly Medicare Part B premium.

If approved for either the QMB or the SLMB program, your mother will be automatically re-enrolled into Part B. The state of Maryland will notify the Social Security Administration of her approval status. Once notified of her approval, Social Security will reinstate her Part B.


Amy Rubino is director of the Senior Health Insurance Assistance Program and the Senior Medicare Patrol for the Anne Arundel County Department of Aging & Disabilities. 
Copyright © Capital Gazette Communications LLC, 2012. 
____________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. 
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

March 20, 2012

NIGERIA: Fayemi signs Social Security Bill into law

ADO AKITI, Nigeria / The Nation / News / March 20, 2012

Ekiti State Governor Kayode Fayemi at the weekend signed the Social Security Bill into Law.
He said the law was borne out of his administration's concern for the welfare of the elderly. 



Fayemi said the social security scheme, which offers indigent elderly citizens a monthly stipend of N5,000, is not a vote-catching gimmick as is being insinuated in some quarters. 

He spoke on Friday at the Executive Council Chambers of the Governor's Office in Ado-Ekiti, the state capital, while signing the law. The governor said it was important for the scheme, which started six months ago, to have a legal backing, in order to ensure its sustainability.

The Ekiti Social Security Scheme, which is the first in Nigeria and West Africa, was announced by the governor on October 1, 2011. Payment of the monthly stipend commenced on October 25.

Fayemi said: "When we initiated the scheme, sceptics thought it was a vote-catching gimmick of a typical opportunistic and desperate politician. "Even to genuine admirers, the realisation of this dream was unfathomable, given the limited resources available in our state. Now that the goal is realised, it is the beginning of the fulfillment of our campaign promise to provide for our elderly.

He said: "It is noteworthy that a number of states, as well as the Federal Government, have shown interest in this scheme and we are glad to have pioneered it. The question my colleagues always ask at the Governors' Forum is how we manage to do all this, given our 35th position on the revenue table."

House of Assembly Speaker Adewale Omirin said: "We are here today making history as the first state in West Africa to initiate a social security system for the aged. We know the critical roles senior citizens play in our lives and the society at large.

"We must always emphasise custom and history as components of social engineering mechanism for development. It is our custom to take care of our aged."

Omirin said the scheme has challenged the Federal Government to start the process of establishing a national social security scheme.

Commissioner for Labour, Productivity and Human Capital Development, Wole Adewumi said the state began paying stipends to 10,084 beneficiaries last October. He said another round of registration has begun to update the database and increase the number of beneficiaries to 20,000.



Source: The Nation, Lagos
____________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. 
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.



September 21, 2011

USA: "No reasonable person would kill Social Security"

PORT HURON, Michigan / The Times Herald / Opinion / September 20, 2011

Social Security is America's greatest social program. It is the sole income for millions of Americans; it has raised millions of retirees out of poverty; it provides benefits to widows and dependents; it provides monthly benefits to disabled workers; it protects elderly parents from becoming burdens; it has never failed to pay benefits; it is free of corruption and scandal in its administration.


The current Republican attack would slash this pillar of our society and leave a vast hole in our nation's security of its retirees, disabled, widows and their children.

For all the years of this program's existence, its enemies have tried to eliminate it and not because it is a Ponzi scheme (which it isn't) but solely because they do not want to pay into the fund the 7.65% of payroll tax now paid by employers and also paid by employees as their premium into this retirement insurance fund.

From Barry Goldwater to today, there have been a multitude of schemes to kill this vital program: Make it voluntary; let it twist in the wind; phase it out; put it in the stock market; and more. The grandaddy of this attack is Peter Petersen, known as the Wall Street raider who specialized in buying companies, selling off their units and pocketing millions. Petersen and those who attack Social Security care not at all about retirees or someday-to-be-retirees. They simply want the billions of dollars they will capture. This happened under Margaret Thatcher in England and virtually destroyed that nation's pension program.

The current attack on Social Security argues that when America has more retirees and fewer workers the system will collapse. Not true. They claim that soon there would be one American of working age for every retiree, but in truth the number of workers supporting every retiree will decline only slightly over the next three decades. And at its low point it will still be greater than it was in the 1960s. That's because of the huge influx of women and immigrants into the work force. Social Security actuaries have determined that in the future there will be sufficient workers to support the program, just as today.

Social Security is fully solvent. In fact, by simply raising the earnings cap so the wealthy pay their fair share into the fund, the solvency will be extended into the indefinite future.

As to the trust fund, the claim is that it has been spent on "worthless IOUs." Anyone who claims this probably has some of these in his or her safety deposit box. They are called T-bills, Treasury notes and government bonds. Nothing in the world is safer. Through the Great Depression, World War II, recessions and heavy unemployment, Social Security checks have always arrived on time and in full amounts. During the many decades of Social Security, banks have failed, insurance companies have gone bankrupt, investors have been defrauded by Wall Street, pension plans have disappeared, but there has never been a single dollar lost to Social Security beneficiaries. Whether an aging baby boomer or teenager, Social Security will be there at retirement ---unless the circling sharks have their way.

It is shocking that anyone would call for the end to Social Security. Right here in Sanilac County, 17.2% of the population receives Social Security payments.

This is not a handout or "entitlement." They paid into the fund all of their working lives. If we are currently in a recession, give a thought to what life would be like for our local economy and for almost 20% of our population if Social Security disappeared.

Ray Denison worked in Congressional relations in Washington, D.C. He is retired and lives in Port Sanilac.

Copyright © 2011 www.thetimesherald.com.
__________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights.
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.