Remember ME - You Me and Dementia

Showing posts with label Crime and Law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Crime and Law. Show all posts

June 11, 2020

World Elder Abuse Awareness Day 2020 - #StandWithOlderPersons #PurpleDotChallenge

We #StandWithOlderPersons and accept #PurpleDotChallenge to raise Awareness and Prevention of Elder Abuse.



On occasion of 'World Elder Abuse Awareness Day' on 15th June 2020, INPEA in association with GAROP and Silver Innings seeks Support of all age group and gender to create awareness about elder abuse and it's prevention.

INPEA wants social media users to post a picture of a #PurpleDot on their palm or any other place or paper and express their thoughts about Elder Abuse, Awareness, Stigma and Prevention.



INPEA has created a separate hash tag #StandWithOlderPersons to take a strong stand on Elders issues. Accept the Purple Dot Challenge and post it on your social media handles with hash tag #StandWithOlderPersons and #PurpleDotChallange



So friends let’s #StandWithOlderPersons and send your Purple dot challenge pictures with your thoughts on our / post social media accounts like Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram or Twitter.

This Challenge is open from 1st June to 30th June.



We will also post your support on our all social media accounts.

You can also forward us your pictures through E-mail at silverinnings@gmail.com or WhatsApp on 91+ 9987104233

Creative Support by Web Solutions India.

#WEAAD #WEAAD2020 #SILVERINNINGS #ELDERABUSE #INPEA 



________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

April 19, 2012

USA: Scammers are stealing from elderly by posing as grandkids in trouble

SEATTLE, Washington / The Seattle Times / News / April 19, 2012

Con artists calling grandparents and pretending to be their grandchildren in desperate need of cash are still striking hard. The FBI, Washington Attorney General's Office and the AARP warn the elderly to be vigilant.
When the phone rang last week at the home of an 83-year-old Eastside man, the caller identified himself as the man's teenage grandson, Ryan.
Ryan said he had been drinking and driving while attending a wedding in Georgia and had struck a pedestrian. He told his grandfather he was now sitting in jail and needed $4,300 for bail.
Ryan begged his grandfather not to tell his parents, fearing their anger.
"I felt so concerned about my grandson," the man recalled Wednesday. "I wanted to do the right thing to get him released and home as soon as possible."
The man wired the money. After subsequent calls over the next several days, the man wired more than $84,000 more, believing all the time he was helping his 17-year-old grandson out of deep trouble.
Avoiding the 'Grandparent Scam'
The state Attorney General's Office is warning about the "Grandparent Scam," involving con artists who pose as relatives to convince elderly victims to wire cash to help pay for emergency car repairs or medical bills or to post bail. The office offers these tips:
Do not fill in the blanks for the scammer: If the person on the line says, "It's your grandson," do not reply by offering a name; instead say, "Which one?" Most likely, the con artist will then hang up.
Confirm your grandchild's whereabouts: Call their house, their work, their school, their friends. Find out where they actually are before offering financial help.
Do not send money unless you have verified where your grandchild is: If the caller asks for your bank-account number or urges you to wire money to him or her, it's likely a scam. Con artists prefer wire transfers because they are fast, there are transfer agents in most communities, and funds can be picked up in multiple locations.
Source: Washington state Attorney General's Office
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Then, last Friday, the man received another call from Ryan, the real Ryan. He told his grandfather he was not in trouble and had been in the Seattle area the whole time.
The man had fallen victim to a well-worn scam that appears to be gaining traction in the era of social media, according to state and federal law-enforcement officials. It's known as the "Grandparent Scam."
"As smart as I am, how dumb I had been," said the man, a retired phone-company employee who asked not to be identified because he is working with King County sheriff's investigators to find the people who scammed him.
An old scam
Washington state Assistant Attorney General Doug Walsh, who heads the agency's Consumer Protection Division, said the Grandparent Scam and its variants have been around for years.
"There are millions of these scams reported to the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) every year," Walsh said. "The Grandparent Scam is happening hundreds of thousands of times a day across the country."
Earlier this month, the FBI sent out an alert saying that its Internet Crime Complaint Center has been receiving reports about the scam since 2008, but that the deception is getting more detailed.
Con artists are spending time searching Facebook and other social-networking sites, as well as conducting basic Internet searches, to learn everything they can about the grandchildren of potential targets, Walsh said. With personal information readily accessible, scam artists are able to learn where grandchildren go to school, where they vacation and even their favorite foods, Walsh said. Through basic Internet searches they can find grandparents' home telephone numbers.
Armed with the information, scammers are calling elderly people at home and claiming to be their grandchild or someone who is with them.
They offer up details about the grandchild's life and then ask for money for anything ranging from bail money to a hospital bill, from attorneys' fees to an airline or bus ticket. They usually follow up by saying, "Don't tell Mom and Dad," Walsh said.
"They want to isolate their victims. The Grandparent Scam engenders trust between the grandparent and grandchild," he said.
Once successful, a scam artist will maintain the ruse and call the victim over the following days with more traumatic stories in a hunt for more cash, Walsh said.
Doug Shadel, Washington state director for AARP, said the organization on a national level has been focusing on the scam and other forms of elder fraud for several years.
"We've interviewed a lot of the cons who have done this kind of thing. They find different ways to get you to react," said Shadel. "What's more emotional than someone calling and posing as your grandson and your granddaughter?"
Shadel, who wrote the book "Outsmarting the Scam Artists," said scammers are also targeting people who are cognitively challenged and might not think as clearly as they had when they were younger.
Walsh said many scam artists work in large-scale operations out of the country. Often, when a person falls for the scam, he or she is placed on what Walsh calls "sucker lists." The lists, he said, are often traded or sold between large scam rings.
Eastside case
In the case of the Eastside man, after the initial call from the individual claiming to be Ryan, a man claiming to be his grandson's lawyer called looking for thousands of dollars more to pay for his fees.
On the third day, it was a plea for another $6,000 to pay for a broken femur suffered by the woman Ryan supposedly hit.
On the fourth day, the man was asked to pay a $500,000 settlement with the woman, who also supposedly miscarried twins after she was struck.
When the man questioned the sum, he was asked to just pay $77,500 to bail his grandson out of jail.
In total, the man said he wired $89,000 from his savings account to help his grandson. He said it never crossed his mind that it could be a scam.
"My wife even said we need to tell his folks and I said no, we promised we wouldn't. I was concerned about him being injured," the man said.
While the Eastside man maintains hope that sheriff's deputies will arrest the people who scammed him, he is certain he will never recoup the money.
King County sheriff's Sgt. Jessica Sullivan said detectives have tracked the con artists to Texas and California. She is working with police in those states to make an arrest.
But, Sullivan added, the only way the man can recover any money is through litigation.
"We know the funds have been spent already in casinos," Sullivan said.
A Belltown couple said they have also received phone calls from would-be scam artists over the past month.
Betty Potter, 87, said the first call came about a month ago from a man claiming that their 24-year-old grandson had been injured in Mexico. The man said he had taken their grandson to the doctor but needed $1,900 to pay the bill and get the man home.
When Potter questioned the man and said she was going to call her daughter to find out whether her grandson was hurt, the man hung up.
About 10 days ago, her husband, Bill Potter, received a call from someone claiming to be his "oldest" grandson.
"He said they had been detained by police in Mexico. He said that they wanted $2,500 and then agreed to lower it to $1,900," said Bill Potter, 88.
"All the time I'm agreeing to pay because I thought it was our grandson. When I asked him for more information he hung up the phone."
Jennifer Sullivan: jensullivan@seattletimes.com. 
On Twitter @SeattleSullivan.
Copyright ©2012 The Seattle Times Company
____________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. 
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

April 4, 2012

FINLAND: Two underage boys rob elderly man, 50, woman, 70

HELSINKI, Finland / Iltasanomat / News / April 3, 2012


Helsinki Police have detained Tuesday morning two boys aged  12 and 15 who attacked and robbed an elderly man, 50, and separately an elderly woman aged 70.  The duo's robbery tactic was to overthrow the older people with a bag they had and then take away their belongings.

____________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. 
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

March 1, 2012

NETHERLANDS: Mobile euthanasia units to make house calls

LONDON, England / The Guardian / World News / Netherlands / March 1, 2012


New scheme called 'Life End' will respond to sick people whose own doctors have refused to help them end their lives at home

 in Berlin


Dutch euthanasia organisation Life-End will be offering its home services 
free of charge to Dutch citizens. Photo credit:  AP
A controversial system of mobile euthanasia units that will travel around the country to respond to the wishes of sick people who wish to end their lives has been launched in the Netherlands.
The scheme, which started on Thursday , will send teams of specially trained doctors and nurses to the homes of people whose own doctors have refused to carry out patients' requests to end their lives.
The launch of the so-called Levenseinde, or "Life End", house-call units – whose services are being offered to Dutch citizens free of charge – coincides with the opening of a clinic of the same name in The Hague, which will take patients with incurable illnesses as well as others who do not want to die at home.
The scheme is an initiative by the Dutch Association for a Voluntary End to Life (NVVE), a 130,000-member euthanasia organisation that is the biggest of its kind in the world.
"From Thursday, the Life End clinic will have mobile teams where people who believe they are eligible for euthanasia can register," Walburg de Jong, a NVVE spokesman, said.
"If they do comply, the teams will be able to carry out the euthanasia at patients' homes should their regular doctors be unable or refuse to help them," he added.
The Netherlands was the first country to legalise euthanasia in 2002 and its legislation on the right to die is considered to be the most liberal in the world.
But doctors cannot be forced to comply with the wishes of patients who request the right to die and many do refuse, which was what prompted NVVE to develop a system to fill the gap.
Sick people or their relatives can submit their applications via telephone or email and if the patient's request fulfils a number of strict criteria, the team is then dispatched.
Legal guidelines state that the person must be incurably sick, be suffering unbearable pain and have expressed the wish to die voluntarily, clearly and on several occasions.
According to De Jong, the team will make contact with the doctor who has refused to help the patient to die and ask what his or her reasons were.
More often than not, he said, the motivations are religious or ethical, adding that sometimes doctors were simply not well enough informed about the law.
If the team is satisfied that the patient's motives are genuine, they will contact another doctor with whom they will start the euthanasia process.
"They will first give the patient an injection, which will put them into a deep sleep, then a second injection follows, which will stop their breathing and heart beat," De Jong said.
Every year 2,300 to 3,100 mercy killings are carried out in the Netherlands, although opponents of the practice claim the figure is much higher because many cases are not registered. The Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) supports euthanasia in principle if there is no alternative, but has distanced itself from the NVVE initiative, arguing that giving it the name Life End will foster the idea that it is for those who it said are simply "weary of life" rather than those who are sick.
It has also questioned whether Life End doctors will have the chance to forge the necessary relationship with a patient to be able to ascertain whether or not his or her life should be ended.
But Jan Kuyper, of the Life End Clinic Foundation, said: "We're not trying to push any boundaries here." He said it was quite possible that the mobile teams would not end up carrying out a mercy killing, either due to medical questions about the case or if doubt is cast on the patient's motives.
Little is known about the Life End teams. But one of the team leaders is believed to be a 67-year-old retired doctor who carried out 20 mercy killings during his medical career.
The teams would be limited to one house visit a week to minimise the psychological burden on them.
In neighbouring Germany, where mercy killings are strictly illegal, euthanasia opponents were particularly vocal in expressing their outrage at the developments. "This is an inhumane proposal," said the German Hospice Foundation, while the group Life Rights for Everyone called it a "warped understanding of [the meaning of] autonomy".
____________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. 
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

February 28, 2012

JAPAN: 880,000 pensions hit by Japan investment scandal

TOKYO, Japan / Japan Today / National News / February 28, 2012

AIJ Investment Advisors reportedly boasted annual returns of up to 240% when in fact 185 billion yen has melted away AFP
A growing scandal around an investment company that has lost $2.3 billion has affected pensions for up to 880,000 people, Japan’s government said Tuesday.
AIJ Investment Advisors has reportedly been lying to clients for years, boasting of annual returns of up to 240% while in fact 185 billion yen in pension investments has melted away.
The company’s operations were suspended last week and the government ordered a probe of 260 asset management firms nationwide after allegations that most of the money in its care had disappeared.
The scandal has shocked Japan, where a rapidly aging middle class population is increasingly looking to private pension funds, while the state retirement pot also struggles due to gross mismanagement of its own.
The government said Tuesday that the 185 billion yen was from 84 separate pension funds, and affected 540,000 employees who were saving for retirement, as well as more than 340,000 people already drawing their pensions.
Most of the 84 funds entrusted fractions of their savings to AIJ, but 13 funds had a quarter of their investments exposed to AIJ, the health ministry said.
The company, which was set up in 1989, has consistently reported healthy returns on investments since the start of the last decade, but financial regulators now say the bulk of the money it looked after is gone.
It was not known whether the money was lost due to market turbulence or because the firm diverted it for other purposes.
The head of the Financial Services Agency (FSA), Shozaburo Jimi, said he had ordered investigations into the assets of 260 investment management firms.
“We will put all of our efforts in to clarify the facts of the AIJ case. We will get to the truth and draft ways to prevent similar incidents in the future,” he told a press conference.
Exact details of how much has been lost were not available as the FSA said it was unable to comment on an ongoing investigation.
The case, however, has further highlighted the gap between what the graying nation needs and its creaking public pension system, run by a government already saddled with debt worth double the nation’s GDP.
The state borrows money to finance roughly a half of its annual budget, amid dwindling tax income due to two decades of economic stagnation and a shrinking workforce caused by population decline.
© 2012 AFP
____________________________________________________________ 
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights.
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

February 27, 2012

USA: Avoid temptation to give money to needy strangers

SOUTH BEND, Indiana / South Bend Tribune / February 26, 2012

By Barbara Brownell

Senior citizens have big hearts, and sometimes their generosity makes them want to give money to strangers who ask for help. But if a stranger knocks on your door and asks for money and you open your home and wallet, it can lead to an unpleasant or dangerous situation.

As the Victim Advocate for the Older Adult Crime Victim Program at REAL Services, I have visited many victims of crime. I have talked to many seniors who gave money to strangers who say they are in need. Often these individuals simply knock on the door of a senior citizen.

But many times, once a stranger has identified a senior as someone who will help them with money, the requests keep coming. When the senior wants to stop the giving, the situation can become unpleasant when the stranger keeps making more requests.

If you want to make sure that your donation actually helps someone in need, the best advice is to not give money to people. If you want to help a hungry person, give to a food bank. If you want to help a child get a toy, donate to a community program that provides toys to families.

Many families don't like to talk about money with their parents. But for the safety of your senior family member, please remind them not to open the door to someone they don't know, hang up on phone calls wanting personal information, and don't give money to strangers.

Copyright © 1994-2011 South Bend Tribune
____________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. 
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

February 26, 2012

USA: Dealing with dementia among aging criminals

NEW YORK, NY / The New York Times / Health /  February 26, 2012

The Vanishing Mind
Life, With Dementia 


By Pam Belluck


SAN LUIS OBISPO, Calif. — Secel Montgomery Sr. stabbed a woman in the stomach, chest and throat so fiercely that he lost count of the wounds he inflicted. In the nearly 25 years he has been serving a life sentence, he has gotten into fights, threatened a prison official and been caught with marijuana.


Dementia is a fast-growing phenomenon in prisons that many are not prepared to handle.
The California Men’s Colony is using convicted killers to care for inmates who
can no longer care for themselves.
Despite that, he has recently been entrusted with an extraordinary responsibility. He and other convicted killers at the California Men’s Colony help care for prisoners with Alzheimer’s disease and other types of dementia, assisting ailing inmates with the most intimate tasks: showering, shaving, applying deodorant, even changing adult diapers.

Their growing roster of patients includes Joaquin Cruz, a convicted killer who is now so addled that he thinks he sees his brother in the water of a toilet, and Walter Gregory, whose short-term memory is ebbing even as he vividly recalls his crime: stabbing and mutilating his girlfriend with a switchblade.

“I cut her eyes out, too,” Mr. Gregory declared recently.

Dementia in prison is an underreported but fast-growing phenomenon, one that many prisons are desperately unprepared to handle. It is an unforeseen consequence of get-tough-on-crime policies — long sentences that have created a large population of aging prisoners. About 10 percent of the 1.6 million inmates in America’s prisons are serving life sentences; another 11 percent are serving over 20 years.

And more older people are being sent to prison. In 2010, 9,560 people 55 and older were sentenced, more than twice as many as in 1995. In that same period, inmates 55 and older almost quadrupled, to nearly 125,000, a Human Rights Watch report found.

While no one has counted cognitively impaired inmates, experts say that prisoners appear more prone to dementia than the general population because they often have more risk factors: limited education, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, depression, substance abuse, even head injuries from fights and other violence.

Many states consider over-50 prisoners elderly, saying they age up to 15 years faster.

With many prisons already overcrowded and understaffed, inmates with dementia present an especially difficult challenge. They are expensive — medical costs for older inmates range from three to nine times as much as those for younger inmates. They must be protected from predatory prisoners. And because dementia makes them paranoid or confused, feelings exacerbated by the confines of prison, some attack staff members or other inmates, or unwittingly provoke fights by wandering into someone else’s cell.

“The dementia population is going to grow tremendously,” says Ronald H. Aday, a sociologist and the author of “Aging Prisoners: Crisis in American Corrections.” “How are we going to take care of them?”

Some prison systems are confronting that now. Many would like to transfer demented inmates tonursing homes, but their often-violent crimes make states reluctant to parole them and nursing homes reluctant to take them.

New York has taken the top-dollar route, establishing a separate unit for cognitively impaired inmates and using professional caregivers, at a cost of about $93,000 per bed annually, compared with $41,000 in the general prison population. Pennsylvania and other states are giving mental health workers special dementia training.

But some struggling prison systems, including those in Louisiana and California, are taking a less expensive but potentially riskier approach. They are training prisoners to handle many of the demented inmates’ daily needs.

“Yeah, they did something horrible to end up here,” said Cheryl Steed, a psychologist at the California Men’s Colony, where prisoners who help inmates with dementia are called Gold Coats because their yellow jackets contrast with the standard-issue blue. But without them, she said, “we wouldn’t be able to care for our dementia patients very well.”

After escorting Joaquin Cruz to an appointment, James Evers, a Gold Coat, was returning him to their adobe-colored cellblock when they encountered corrections officers strip-searching inmates for missing tools.

Mr. Cruz, 60, who barely recalls that he is in prison for killing someone who sold him fake cocaine, grew confused and resistant when guards tried searching him. “He has Alzheimer’s,” Mr. Evers managed to explain. “It’s not that he’s refusing to do what you’re asking.”

At the prison, shadowed by seacoast mountains, Gold Coats are paid $50 a month and have better knowledge of impaired prisoners’ conditions than many prison guards. Gold Coats, trained by theAlzheimer’s Association and given thick manuals on dementia, were the first to notice when Mr. Cruz began putting his boots on the wrong feet and “started pulling down his pants and going to the bathroom wherever he was,” said Phillip Burdick, a Gold Coat who is serving a life sentence for beating a man to death with a hammer.

Gold Coats report these changes, often at weekly support group meetings with Dr. Steed. They identify “different tricks and strategies to get guys to do what they need to do,” she said.

Before the program was started in 2009, demented inmates frequently caused fights, hitting those they considered threatening or disturbing other prisoners by encroaching on their turf. “The whole atmosphere was hostile,” said Bettina Hodel, a psychologist who started the program and once narrowly avoided being struck herself. Now, Gold Coats absorb much of that behavior. 

Read more


© 2012 The New York Times Company
____________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. 
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.

February 7, 2012

EUROPE: Media interest in celebrities' lives is legitimate, European court rules

STRASBOURG, France / The Guardian / Media / February 7, 2012

Privacy and the Media
European court of human rights rules media should be allowed to publish stories about well-known people in landmark judgment

, legal affairs correspondent, guardian.co.uk
 

Princess Caroline had complained that photographs of her represented an invasion of her private life.
Photograph: Miguel Medina/AFP/Getty Images



The private lives of celebrities are of legitimate interest to the media, the European court of human rights (ECHR) has ruled in landmark judgments involving a cocaine-possessing German TV actor and Princess Caroline of Monaco.

The decisions by the Strasbourg court establish significant legal precedents for privacy cases in British courts, tipping the balance back towards freedom of expression.

In both cases the judges said that as long as the media carried out a reasonable balancing exercise, considering privacy issues, they should be able to publish stories about and photographs of "well-known people".

The fine imposed on the mass-circulation German newspaper Bild for reporting the arrest of the German actor on drug charges at the Munich Beer festival had had a "chilling effect", the Strasbourg court ruled. The "well-known" actor, who played the part of a heroic police superintendent, was referred to only as X throughout the judgment.

The UK-based Media Legal Defence Initiative was among groups that submitted comments to the hearing, arguing that Article 8 of the European convention on human rights, guaranteeing right to private and family life should not trump free speech.

Lawyers for Princess Caroline von Hannover, the daughter of the late Prince Rainier of Monaco, had complained that photographs of her represented an invasion of her private life.

Earlier judgments had supported her applications for injunctions against a magazine that used pictures of her and her husband during a skiing holiday. She claimed they had been taken without her consent.

But one article showed the couple taking a walk during their skiing holiday in St Moritz and was accompanied by a story reporting on the poor health of Prince Rainier. The German courts declined to support her complaints about that article.

In its judgment, the Strasbourg court said: "Irrespective of the question to what extent Caroline von Hannover assumed official functions on behalf of the Principality of Monaco, it could not be claimed that the applicants … were ordinary private individuals. They had to be regarded as public figures.

"The German courts had concluded that the applicants had not provided any evidence that the photos had been taken in a climate of general harassment, as they had alleged, or that they had been taken secretly." They were walking in a public place. The magazine, Frau in Spiegel, had not therefore infringed her privacy rights under Article 8, the ECHR judgment ruled.

Padraig Reidy, of the free speech organisation Index on Censorship, welcomed the decision. "The photographs of Princess Caroline were taken in a public place," he said. "The original ruling was extremely problematic because it decided that privacy issues took precedence over other concerns such as freedom of expression.

"The earlier ruling had been used as an exemplar of how to handle privacy cases in a number of British cases. It's great to see that the Strasbourg court has ruled that there was a violation of other rights in the original case. It tilts the balance back from privacy towards freedom of expression."

Caroline Kean, a solicitor at the London law firm Wiggin who specialises in privacy cases, said: "The [original Princess] Caroline decision was relied on by celebrity solicitors to seek to stop the publication of any photographs of their clients that were not approved, and though it was not immediately incorporated in our laws, was relied on by the court of appeal in the JK Rowling case.

"This does redress the balance and makes it clear that even if Caroline did not seek out a public role, having been born into the royal family, she is a public figure and therefore photos of her other than at public functions can be legitimately published."

It showed that the context in which the photo was published, rather than the photo itself, was crucial, she added, and that "the definition of a 'debate of general interest' is much more open and flexible than possibly appeared to be the case hitherto".

____________________________________________________________
Credit: Reports and photographs are property of owners of intellectual rights. 
Seniors World Chronicle, a not-for-profit, serves to chronicle and widen their reach.